Florida: Where the Stand Your Ground law will always agree that a white guy had a good reason to murder a black teenager.
Seems like this guy would’ve been in the clear if he’d managed to kill everyone in the car since the jury couldn’t decide on the one murder charge but had no trouble with all the attempted murder charges.
The whole situation is so incredibly disturbing for so many reasons. Not the least of which is how often this kind of thing keeps happening.
I’ve now watched the first two episodes of HBO’s new anthology series “True Detective” and all I can say is that it’s truly boring.
I was really excited for this show … and then I fell asleep three times during the series premier two weeks ago. In the second episode, as far as I can recall, absolutely nothing happens. The show looks really great and the whole thing is based on a smart idea, but I find myself continually checking how much time is left … and not in a good way.
I’m going to keep watching because I can’t stop something once I’ve started it and because there are only six episodes left.
But my goodness this really didn’t live up to all the hype.
Almost 70 years ago, South Carolina electrocuted 14-year-old George Stinney, the youngest person to be executed by an American state since the 1800s. Family members today say he’s innocent, and while they can’t bring him back, they want his name cleared.
A black teen in the Jim Crow South, Stinney was accused of murdering two white girls, ages 7 and 11, as they hunted for wildflowers in Alcolu, about 50 miles southeast of Columbia.
Stinney, according to police, confessed to the crime. No witness or evidence that might vindicate him was presented during a trial that was over in fewer than three hours. An all-white jury convicted him in a flash, 10 minutes, and he was sentenced to “be electrocuted, until your body be dead in accordance with law. And may God have mercy on your soul,” court documents say.
Fewer than three months after the girls’ deaths, Stinney was escorted to an electric chair at a Columbia penitentiary, built for much larger defendants. The chair’s straps were loose on Stinney’s 5-foot-1-inch, 95-pound frame, and books were placed on the seat so he would fit in the chair.
On its website, CNN is asking: “Was execution of boy, 14, justice?”
This seemed to me like such an unbelievably ridiculous question for so many reasons that I was planning to do nothing but lampoon CNN in this blog post …
But then I read the comments.
And — guess what? — plenty of people think that the confession of a 14 year old is all the evidence you need for justice to be done; that the word of a white police officer who says a black boy confessed to killing two white girls is clearly unimpeachable in the Jim Crow South; that due process clearly doesn’t matter all that much when it comes to justice; and that, even if he was guilty, executing a 14 year old somehow equates with justice.
So, yeah, I guess a whole bunch of us still have no idea what justice means.
Once A Year Advertising
As regular readers know, I never advertise on this blog … which means you get 365 days of content without having to deal with ads. Except this year, Amazon is giving me $10 (instead of the usual $2) every time anyone clicks on the above banner and signs up for a free trial of Amazon Prime, between now and January 10.
What will I do with the $10 I get when you sign up for your free trial?
I’ll use it to buy books for a friend of mine who’s an inmate in North Carolina. I’ve known him for more than a decade, ever since I was in graduate school and used to visit him and some other guys every week. I’ve moved twice since then but we’ve always kept in touch.
He’s whip-smart, he’s a voracious reader, and he’s got a whole lot of time on his hands … so please consider clicking and signing up for a free trial of Amazon Prime to help me keep him in new reading material throughout 2014.
And, if you’ve got book recommendations for my friend, send them my way.
This is what moral bankrupcy looks like:
Execution rescheduled to accommodate Pam Bondi fundraiser
After [Florida Governor Rick] Scott last month rescheduled the execution for Sept. 10, the date of [Attorney General Pam] Bondi’s “hometown campaign kickoff” at her South Tampa home, Bondi’s office asked that it be postponed. The new date is Oct. 1.
Scott said Monday that he did not know the reason for the request, and he declined to answer when asked whether he considers a campaign fundraiser an appropriate reason to reschedule an execution.
The focus of the article to which I’ve linked is on delaying justice. But that’s only half of the story. For people like me, who oppose the state killing its citizens (even those who commit crimes), the other half of the story is the utter and complete moral bankrupcy of telling a healthy human being that you’re going to take him out of a cage on September 10 to pump his body full of poison and then, after he’s suffered with that knowledge for a little while, tell him that you’ve changed your mind, that he’ll get to live for a few more weeks because of the AG’s previously scheduled fundraising event, and that you’ll just poison him to death on October 1 instead.
This is torture, plain and simple, and it’s inherent in our death penalty system; most of the time, of course, it happens because of legal challenges that result in last minute stays of execution. But in this case it’s being done not in a last ditch attempt to save the life of the condemned man, but to ensure that the state official who wants to kill him can also have a nice time at her fundraising party.