Apparently, upright citizens are outraged that the Obama 2012 website is selling prints of a stylized American flag with the Obama campaign symbol in the spot where the stars would traditionally be found on an actual flag.
A Facebook friend notified me of this inane non-story when he expressed his completely non-partisan outrage at this criminal desecration of the flag (see above). Apparently my Facebook friend doesn’t understand the difference between a representation of a thing and the thing itself; he pointed me to the U.S. Flag Code in case I wasn’t clear about how to properly care for and display a flag (and, of course, that one should never cover up or place anything on it).
The fact that a drawing is not a flag seems entirely lost on him (and, now, a gaggle of his other conservative Facebook friends, who have weighed in). They also believe, it seems, that if I drew a sketch of the Mona Lisa, that sketch would be the Mona Lisa; if I tore up my sketch, I would be destroying the Mona Lisa.
Of course, even if this was an actual flag — which it most obviously is not — there’s nothing inherently wrong with representing the American flag in a way that these people find objectionable … and there are Supreme Court cases to that effect.
The best part about the story on the Fox News website is that the commenters — who are all outraged beyond belief about this print, because it desecrates the flag — know that it’s perfectly legal to burn an actual American flag; the very first comments say: “Now this is a flag I’m happy to burn” (This comment has 769 Likes); “I’ll start the fire!” (294 Likes); “Let me know when you start the fire and I will be there. This is an outrage and disgusting” (264 Likes).
“Partisan squabbles aside,” indeed.

Apparently, upright citizens are outraged that the Obama 2012 website is selling prints of a stylized American flag with the Obama campaign symbol in the spot where the stars would traditionally be found on an actual flag.

A Facebook friend notified me of this inane non-story when he expressed his completely non-partisan outrage at this criminal desecration of the flag (see above). Apparently my Facebook friend doesn’t understand the difference between a representation of a thing and the thing itself; he pointed me to the U.S. Flag Code in case I wasn’t clear about how to properly care for and display a flag (and, of course, that one should never cover up or place anything on it).

The fact that a drawing is not a flag seems entirely lost on him (and, now, a gaggle of his other conservative Facebook friends, who have weighed in). They also believe, it seems, that if I drew a sketch of the Mona Lisa, that sketch would be the Mona Lisa; if I tore up my sketch, I would be destroying the Mona Lisa.

Of course, even if this was an actual flag — which it most obviously is not — there’s nothing inherently wrong with representing the American flag in a way that these people find objectionable … and there are Supreme Court cases to that effect.

The best part about the story on the Fox News website is that the commenters — who are all outraged beyond belief about this print, because it desecrates the flag — know that it’s perfectly legal to burn an actual American flag; the very first comments say: “Now this is a flag I’m happy to burn” (This comment has 769 Likes); “I’ll start the fire!” (294 Likes); “Let me know when you start the fire and I will be there. This is an outrage and disgusting” (264 Likes).

“Partisan squabbles aside,” indeed.

submit to reddit

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Notes
  1. sidekicksaba reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  2. texarshead reblogged this from stfuconservatives and added:
    I’m just waiting for the day these people are attacking Obama because he breaths air, I mean, that’s about how...
  3. the-eldest-woman-on reblogged this from election
  4. ilysespieces reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  5. cats-boys-satan reblogged this from superavengedoctormerlock
  6. nerdlover510 reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  7. cheshire420 reblogged this from election
  8. clear-sight reblogged this from jahloveangel
  9. jahloveangel reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  10. teensyteatime reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  11. littleboyjew reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  12. tailypo-tailypo reblogged this from becomingwater and added:
    While I completely understand the point of this and agree with the person above me, I also have to be that asshole who...
  13. inquisitive2816 reblogged this from election
  14. becomingwater reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  15. naaza reblogged this from stfuconservatives and added:
    I want that. I couldn’t find it in the store, so I was gonna ask where to get it. But then I noticed that it’s limited...
  16. peasandchocolate reblogged this from partoftheprecipitate
  17. lentilstuck reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  18. chaotic-awesome reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  19. katiethedrowpriestess reblogged this from superavengedoctormerlock
  20. superavengedoctormerlock reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  21. timetravelingwithabox reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  22. rgrutan reblogged this from nikineon and added:
    Okay, so, want an example that no one cares about because it’s a video game? Do a Google image search for the Assassin’s...
  23. sir-moustachamasauraus reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  24. lifeismykryptonite reblogged this from election
  25. visualized-thoughts reblogged this from election